Tolstoy's short story "How Much Land Does a Man Need?"
presents several notable themes. First, there is social humiliation and fear
of/preoccupation with foolery. One of the first observations that is made about
the Bashkir elder is that he "seemed a fool," immediately demoting
him from importance and emphasizing the importance of appearing cognizant. This
theme appears later when Pakhom is afraid to stop because he feels the
onlookers will call him an "idiot." His fear of being labelled an
idiot (like a fool) propels him forth into death from exhaustion. Anxiety
towards social humiliation, as the Bashkirs watch, leads to his demise-- once
Pakhom hears the spectators cheers, he receives a burst of adrenaline, fueled by
social acceptance in the cheers, and wins his bet, dying in the process.
Tolstoy seems to be suggesting that adherence to social guidelines and
desperation for social approval pose a problem, and that while Pakhom deems the
elder to be a fool, he is hypocritical, for he is a fool himself for being
deathly preoccupied with labeling.
Another dominant, clear theme and message in this short story is
that greed is a pernicious characteristic. Evidently, Tolstoy is suggesting
that the protagonist’s avarice is a major component in his death sentence. He lusts
for more land than he needs, more land than he can cover in a day, and pays the
ultimate price. We are even given a blatant demonstration of this when Pakhom
wonders if “I was too greedy.” This theme also plays into Tolstoy’s ongoing
preoccupation with religious values. Greed is one of the traditionally Christian
“Seven Deadly Sins,” thus Tolstoy’s condemnation of greed goes along with his
encouragement towards religious values.
A third theme in this short story is the mastery of nature, and
the inevitability of nature’s dominance. There are hints of appreciation for
nature; the protagonist thiks the land around him to be “beautiful.” However,
despite Pakhom literally trying to run circles around the beautiful land,
nature runs circles around him. Pakhom sweats from the heat, and his feet are
mutilated by the rough terrain. Also, the sun sets for Pakhom before he reaches
the finish—at least at first. Nature beats him down, though he tries in vain to
possess it. Also, the setting of the sun is ironically indicative of the
dominance of the initially labelled “fool,” the elder of the Bashkirs. The sun
sets for Pakhom on his side of the hill, signaling his impending doom, while
the sun does not yet set where the Bashkirs reside. In a way, the sun
represents the power of nature in the favor of the elder, also discrediting the
narrator’s calling him a fool in the beginning.
Hi
ReplyDeleteI really like your interpretation of this story and its symbolism such as Pakhom's thoughts about the elder, and the setting sun.
I have just read this story and thought it was very clever writing. Also it is a moral lesson that can still be relevant today.
If you are interested I have reviewed this book also on my blog at anitasbookbag.co.uk
Anita
Nice post.
ReplyDelete